Threat Scenarios
What AIQ CySy protects you from.
Realistic AI-native attack paths across LLMs, agents, pipelines, and human decision-makers.
LLM-Powered Customer Support
Customers interact with an LLM assistant backed by internal data.
- Retrieval poisoning via compromised knowledge bases
- Prompt injection to bypass safety and leak data
- Impersonation and fraud through manipulated responses
- Regulatory exposure from incorrect or biased answers
AI-Augmented Security Operations
SOC analysts use LLM copilots to summarize alerts and suggest actions.
- Adversarial prompts shape analyst decisions
- Alert summaries that hide critical indicators
- Model drift under targeted adversarial inputs
- Low-visibility changes to response playbooks
Agentic Workflows & Automation
Autonomous or semi-autonomous agents act across tools and APIs.
- Unexpected action chains triggered by crafted inputs
- Agent-to-agent amplification of adversarial goals
- Shadow decision paths outside of existing controls
- Difficulty reconstructing what actually happened
How AIQ CySy Responds
From unknown risk to defined, defendable surfaces.
- Map each scenario to AI→AI, AI→Human, Human→AI, and Environment→AI pathways.
- Apply zero-day reasoning to identify not-yet-documented risks.
- Produce a clear attack graph and prioritized mitigation list.
- Align findings with NIST, ENISA, OWASP GenAI, and MITRE ATLAS.
Outcome
You leave each engagement with a concrete understanding of:
- Where AI can be attacked or abused
- What the most likely and most damaging paths are
- Which controls close the highest-risk gaps
- How to communicate the plan to leadership and regulators
The goal is not theoretical risk — it is a practical path to defensible AI operations.